Medical Management Enhancement Program

-  Phase I
-  Phase II
-  Phase III

Data Quality and Integrity Review
Care Management Evaluation Program
PCP and Specialty Profiling
Facility Performance Evaluation
Pharmacy Analysis

RPNavigator Services


Data Analysis Tool: RPNavigator Health Plans


Client Testimonials
Consulting Solutions and Services
Health Plans

Facility Performance Evaluation

Defining Best Practices for Hospitals  with Drill-Down to Procedure and Physician Performance Drivers

Traditional analyses of facilities use DRG (Diagnosis Related Groups) and MDCs (Major Diagnostic Categories) for comparing cost and utilization metrics across facilities. These analyses are criticized as indiscriminate, because the underlying algorithms do not incorporate significant differences in case mix and severity. For example, a comparison of the average length of stay (ALOS) for various institutions should recognize the effects of procedure volume differences as well as the complexity of individual patients and patients in the aggregate.

3M Health Information Systems developed an algorithm, known as All Patient Refined DRGs (APR-DRGs), which can divide hospital admissions into four levels of severity of illness (SOI) and four risk of mortality (ROM) grades. This approach yields significantly more valid comparisons of performance among hospitals, such as cost, length of stay, complication rates and readmission rates. It can also be used to determine which departments are contributing to overall facility performance and, within each department, which procedures and physicians are adversely affecting departmental metrics.


The chart below illustrates the problem of trying to study four different cases of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease using DRGs vs. APR-DRGs.  The case weights attributed to them are quite different under CMS DRGs vs. APRs (see the last two lines), and therefore analyses of cost and utilization metrics will be quite different. 

CareAdvantage utilizes APR-DRGs in its analyses of facility and specialty performance and creates reports, tables and graphs, incorporating the following case mix and severity adjusted metrics:

(1)   ALOS by hospital, department, high volume major procedures, high volume specialists

(2)   Total Cost per stay by hospital, hospital department, high volume major procedures, high volume specialists

(3)   Actual to expected mortality rate by hospital, hospital department, high volume major procedures, high volume specialists

(4)   Complication rates for high volume procedures

(5)   Readmission rates by hospital, hospital department, high volume major procedures, high volume specialists

(6)   Ratio of total costs relative to severity of illness and/or risk of mortality

(7)   Number and types of AHRQ-Ambulatory Sensitive admissions by physician

In addition, CareAdvantage can analyze potential preventable admission rates and 1 day stays by hospital and principal managing physician.

The resulting set of reports is used for cost, utilization and quality profiling to generate a balanced report of facility performance as well as PHO (Physician Hospital Organization) or IPA (Independent Practice Association) performance.  



CareAdvantage, Inc.     485C Rt. 1 South,    Iselin, NJ 08830     732.362.5000    (Fax) 732.362.5005